Page Contents
Subway claps back at John Oliver: A Closer Look
Fast-food sandwich giant Subway recently found itself in the spotlight after being the subject of John Oliver’s popular “Last Week Tonight” show. In a segment dedicated to the company, Oliver delved into various aspects of Subway’s operations, sparking a heated discussion about the company’s treatment of franchisees and marketing practices. Let’s take a closer look at how Subway responded to John Oliver’s criticism.
The Last Week Tonight Segment
“Last Week Tonight is a weekly HBO show hosted by comedian John Oliver that humorously dissects and satirizes major news stories from the previous week. In a recent episode, Oliver devoted a significant portion of the show to Subway, highlighting several issues surrounding the sandwich chain.
Oliver’s segment touched on several topics, including Subway’s marketing practices, the abundance of its locations, and the competition that comes from having multiple franchises in close proximity. He also criticized the company for allegedly providing inadequate support to its franchisees and for imposing harsh penalties for minor infractions.
Subway’s concerns
In response to John Oliver’s segment, Subway issued a statement expressing concern about the potential negative impact on its franchisees. The company emphasized that its franchisees are small business owners who serve communities every day and should not be unfairly affected by misleading characterizations.
Subway acknowledged past criticism of its franchising practices dating back to the 1990s. However, the company emphasized that it has a new leadership team and a different approach to its business. Subway said it worked with the producers of “Last Week Tonight” to ensure they understood these changes.
Criticism and Defense
While some viewers agreed with John Oliver’s criticism, others felt the segment went too far. Harold Kestenbaum, a franchise attorney, argued that Subway shouldn’t be singled out for having one-sided franchise agreements, which are common among large franchisors. Kestenbaum suggested that franchisees are well aware of the terms they are agreeing to when they sign the agreements.
Kestenbaum also stated that Oliver owed the DeLuca family, Subway’s founders, an apology for his comments. This highlights the different perspectives on the issue and the complexity of evaluating Subway’s practices.
Subway’s Response and Beyond
Subway’s response to the segment demonstrates the company’s concern for its franchisees and its commitment to addressing the issues raised. By working with the producers of “Last Week Tonight,” Subway wanted to ensure that the show’s viewers understood the changes in its leadership and business approach.
It is worth noting that Subway is not the first major food brand to be scrutinized by John Oliver. In the past, Oliver has called attention to various issues within the food industry, and companies like Pringles have responded by donating to charity.
As the conversation about Subway’s practices continues, it remains to be seen how the company will address the concerns raised by John Oliver and others. The spotlight on Subway serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and fair treatment within the franchising industry.
In conclusion, Subway’s response to John Oliver’s segment reflects its commitment to its franchisees and its willingness to address criticism. The ongoing discussion highlights the challenges facing the fast food industry and underscores the need for open dialogue and improvement.
FAQS
What made John Oliver criticize Subway?
John Oliver dedicated a segment of his show “Last Week Tonight” to Subway, discussing issues ranging from the company’s marketing practices to its treatment of franchisees.
How did Subway respond to John Oliver’s criticism?
Subway expressed concern about the potential negative impact on its franchisees and issued a statement emphasizing its new leadership team and a different approach to its business. The company worked with the producers of “Last Week Tonight” to ensure they understood these changes.
What were John Oliver’s main concerns?
John Oliver criticized Subway for allowing too many franchises to open in close proximity to each other, creating competition among them. He also claimed that the company provided insufficient support to franchisees and imposed harsh penalties for minor infractions.
How has Subway addressed the issue of franchise agreements?
Subway has been criticized for having one-sided franchise agreements, but some argue that this is common among large franchisors. Subway’s defense is that franchisees are aware of the terms they are agreeing to when they sign the agreements.
How did the franchise experts respond?
Harold Kestenbaum, a franchise attorney, defended Subway by stating that Oliver owed the DeLuca family, Subway’s founders, an apology for his comments. Kestenbaum also argued that one-sided franchise agreements are not unique to Subway and that franchisees are aware of the terms they are agreeing to.
How does Subway’s response reflect its commitment to its franchisees?
Subway’s response demonstrates its concern for the well-being of its franchisees and its commitment to addressing the issues raised. By working with the producers of “Last Week Tonight,” Subway wanted to ensure that viewers understood the changes in its leadership and approach.